Skip to content

Research

What does carbon-footprint feedback actually change?

A 2024 Journal of Cleaner Production study tested whether repeated feedback from a carbon-footprint tracking app could help people adjust consumption habits.

The study at a glance

Repeated feedback, tested over time.

216

participants

4

consumption domains

Several

survey rounds

Reported results

A meaningful signal, with important boundaries.

The researchers reported a 23% average decrease in carbon emissions. Effects varied by consumption area, from 12% in mobility to 35% in household activities.

Emissions decrease observed in the study

Overall

Average across the study

23%

Mobility

Lowest reported domain result

12%

Household

Highest reported domain result

35%

Scale shown to 40% for visual comparison. Values are reported by Hoffmann, Lasarov, Reimers, and Trabandt (2024), not measured outcomes from Green Compass users.

Accessible summary of reported study results
ResultDecreaseContext
Overall23%Average across the study
Mobility12%Lowest reported domain result
Household35%Highest reported domain result

Four domains

Where daily consumption takes shape.

01

Mobility

Travel choices such as private cars, public transport, cycling, and shared journeys.

02

Food

Diet, sourcing, and food-waste decisions that can add up over time.

03

Heating

Home energy use, insulation, temperature settings, and heating systems.

04

Household

Electricity, devices, purchases, and other everyday consumption patterns.

Read this carefully

What the numbers do—and do not—mean.

The study tested a purpose-built research app with 216 participants. Its results should not be treated as a universal forecast for every app, person, or timeframe.

Effects differed by domain and individual characteristics. The paper reports that perceived green self-efficacy strengthened the effect, while a strong green self-identity reduced it.

For Green Compass, the responsible takeaway is that repeated, useful feedback is worth exploring—not that a specific reduction can be guaranteed.

Read the full publication

Discuss the evidence

Questions, challenges, and useful criticism are welcome.

If you work in sustainability, research, or behavior change, we would value your perspective.

See how this informs the product