Mobility
Travel choices such as private cars, public transport, cycling, and shared journeys.
Research
A 2024 Journal of Cleaner Production study tested whether repeated feedback from a carbon-footprint tracking app could help people adjust consumption habits.
The study at a glance
216
participants
4
consumption domains
Several
survey rounds
Reported results
The researchers reported a 23% average decrease in carbon emissions. Effects varied by consumption area, from 12% in mobility to 35% in household activities.
Overall
Average across the study
23%
Mobility
Lowest reported domain result
12%
Household
Highest reported domain result
35%
Scale shown to 40% for visual comparison. Values are reported by Hoffmann, Lasarov, Reimers, and Trabandt (2024), not measured outcomes from Green Compass users.
| Result | Decrease | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 23% | Average across the study |
| Mobility | 12% | Lowest reported domain result |
| Household | 35% | Highest reported domain result |
Four domains
Travel choices such as private cars, public transport, cycling, and shared journeys.
Diet, sourcing, and food-waste decisions that can add up over time.
Home energy use, insulation, temperature settings, and heating systems.
Electricity, devices, purchases, and other everyday consumption patterns.
Read this carefully
The study tested a purpose-built research app with 216 participants. Its results should not be treated as a universal forecast for every app, person, or timeframe.
Effects differed by domain and individual characteristics. The paper reports that perceived green self-efficacy strengthened the effect, while a strong green self-identity reduced it.
For Green Compass, the responsible takeaway is that repeated, useful feedback is worth exploring—not that a specific reduction can be guaranteed.
Read the full publicationDiscuss the evidence
If you work in sustainability, research, or behavior change, we would value your perspective.
See how this informs the product